The tendency to believe, after learning an outcome, that one would have foreseen it.
Our confidence in our knowledge is greater than our objective accuracy.
Hindsight Bias
Overconfidence
Critical Thinking
Curiosity
Skepticism
Humility
Thinking that does not blindly accept arguments and conclusions. It examines assumptions, discerns hidden values, evaluates evidence, and assesses conclusions.
Curiosity: Sample Questions
Does participation in sports improve grades?
Does caffeine improve mental acuity?
Is musical taste an indicator of intelligence?
Does texting diminish interpersonal communication?
Hypothesis: A testable prediction often implied by a theory.
Alternate: A statement of difference.
Null: A statement of NO difference.
Theory: An explanation using an integrated set of principles that organizes observations and predicts behaviors and events.
Law: A general statement describing some pattern in nature that holds without exception under specified conditions.
Theory: A hypothesis that has been tested and supported many times. Serves as a basis for describing observed patterns.
Hypothesis: A possible answer to a question.
A statement to describe the procedures used to define/measure the research variables (DV and IV) of a study.
Necessity of Operational Definitions
Allow for appropriate analysis of statistical findings.
Facilitate peer review.
Allow for replication—repeating the essence of a research study, usually with different participants in different situations to see whether the basic finding extends to other experiments.
Descriptive: Gathering information pertaining to the research question.
Correlation: Does a relationship exist between two variables?
Experiments: Is there a causal relationship between two variables?
In-depth study of one person or a small group.
Utilizes observation, testing, interviews, etc.
Popular with Freud and Piaget.
Strengths
Allows study of infrequent or non-replicable subjects.
Provides detailed description.
Weaknesses
Observer bias.
Inability to generalize to larger populations.
Patient of Josef Breuer.
Fell ill during her father's illness and death.
Symptoms: cough, blurred vision, hallucinations, partial aphasia, loss of use of her left side.
Treated using the "talking cure," which became the foundation of Psychoanalysis.
Her illness continued after treatment.
Systematic observation of an organism in its natural setting.
Strengths
Behavior is not influenced by an artificial environment.
Data gathered at the time of the event.
Weaknesses
Observer bias.
Observer influence (effect).
Inability to generalize to other populations.
Basic Research: Seeks answers for the sake of increasing knowledge.
Applied Research: Seeks answers for specific problems.
Collecting self-reported attitudes, opinions, or behaviors, usually by questioning a representative, random sample.
Strengths
Cheap, large reach, quick, and easy.
Weaknesses
Self-reports may be inaccurate or fabricated.
Question wording can influence results.
Sampling errors can skew data.
Measures the relationship between two factors; allows prediction of one from the other.
Correlation Coefficient: Ranges from -1 to +1 (Pearson’s r).
Closer to +1: Stronger positive relationship.
Closer to -1: Stronger negative relationship.
CORRELATION DOES NOT IMPLY CAUSATION
Graph of plotted data points showing the relationship between two variables.
Slope suggests direction (positive/negative).
Scatter suggests strength of relationship (r).
Positive Correlation: Both variables rise/fall together.
Negative Correlation: One variable rises, the other falls.
Perceived but nonexistent relationship.
We notice and recall events that support our beliefs.
Explains superstitious beliefs.
We tend to look for meaningful patterns, even when none exist.
Only method to determine cause and effect.
Participants: Subjects.
Variables: Factors that can vary.
Operational Definitions: Procedures used to measure variables.
Independent Variable (IV): Manipulated; the cause.
Dependent Variable (DV): Measured; the effect.
Confounding Variables: Uncontrolled factors influencing the DV.
Experimental Bias: Unintentional influence from the experimenter.
Experimental Group: Receives treatment.
Control Group: No treatment, same in all other ways.
Random Assignment: Randomly assigning participants to minimize differences.
Placebo: Fake treatment for control group.
Placebo Effect: Results caused by expectation alone.
Single Blind Study: Participants unaware of their group.
Double Blind Study: Both participants and experimenters are unaware.
Participants: White mice.
IV: Protein in the seeds.
DV: Mass of each mouse.
Operational Definition: 300 mice, same age/weight, split into groups.
Statistics help analyze and interpret data.
Misrepresented data can lead to false conclusions.
Mean: Average.
Median: Middle score.
Mode: Most frequent score.
Bimodal/Multimodal: Data sets with more than one mode.
Range: Highest score minus lowest.
Standard Deviation: Dispersion of scores around the mean.
Use a representative sample.
Ensure large sample size.
Look for less variable data.
Determines if differences between group means are due to real effects or chance.
Less than 5% due to chance (p < 0.05).
Chi Square: Relationship between variables.
T Score: Probability that group differences are due to chance.
Benefits outweigh the risks.
Minimize risks.
Protect welfare and dignity.
Follow state/federal laws.
Informed consent.
Deception only if justified; must debrief.
Right to withdraw.
No mental/physical harm.
Repair any harm caused.
Confidentiality.
Debrief participants on purpose/findings.
Treat animals humanely.
Follow state/federal laws.
Trained psychologists supervise.
Minimize pain/discomfort.
Use proper anesthesia/sterilization.
If necessary, euthanize quickly and painlessly.